Handheld Learning: Day 2

I had a real sense of anticipation about today as it was the beginning of the actual conference. Yesterday was a great settling in introduction, now it was the turn of the real thng.

I arrived bang on time, just as Graeme started to introduce the main players i.e. the exhibitors. Each spoke for a few moments on industry updated and development from a commercial stand point. A £139 netbook (Toshiba?) was announced and last nights award winner Study Wiz announced it’s new 14 – 19 version.

After the industry updates their was an opening address by the Chairman of Becta, Andrew Pinder. Which had to be done I suppose… it was a tad dry and forced.

Then came Steven Berlin Johnson, who’s book “Everything Bad is Good for You” is definitely on my Xmas wish list. He spoke about crucial juxtapositions of science, technology and personal experience.

“Steven has also co-created three influential web sites: the pioneering online magazine FEED, the Webby-Award-winning community site, Plastic.com, and most recently the hyperlocal media site outside.in.

Both social critic and technologist, Steven has a genius for mapping the future—for predicting and explaining the real-world impact of cutting-edge developments in science, technology and media.

Steven is a contributing editor to Wired magazine and a Distinguished Writer In Residence at the New York University Department of Journalism.

Named by Newsweek as one of the “Fifty People Who Matter Most on the Internet,” Steven has also written for The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, The Nation, and many other periodicals.”

His analysis of the bewildering ‘Lost’ TV show was particularly thought provoking and how it was structured more like a game than a regular production. My question would have been “How the hell do you pitch an idea like that?”. He also went into a Shirky-esque debate, counter-arguing the authorities rekindled fears that our kids aint reading enough. The fact remains that they are probably reading a lot more, its just not from books anymore.

Most intriguing was his outline of gaming and how (he used the example of World of Warcrafts complex UI) interfaces are central to participation. The complexity of navigating and using an interface such as this cannot be any less involved than learning basic algebra, to a 14 year old. Indeed, the series ‘Lost’ is just a complex in it’s structure.

Is this UI any less complex than learning algebra.

Is this UI any less complex than learning algebra.

I thoroughly enjoyed Steven’s presentation, he has the same calmly approachable manner that is also present with Clay Shirky and Charles Leadbeater.

The iPhones (which I am Twittering and blogging on) is proving to be problematic due to it’s crappy battery life and equally as useless camera. It’s starting to irk.

To see Steven's presentation follow thislink

After the break, another treat, Danah Boyd gave an intriguing insight into Social Media and the sociological implications that this form of medium dredges up. Facebook was the main topic of interest and how youngsters use it and more importantly, see themselves on it. She asked some important questions and outlined the dangers of invading this type of space, from an educational point of view. The student always has the option to shut down and migrate elsewhere, taking their peers with them. Her visuals were stunning, the best I came across at the conference. I don’t know about you, but more than two words on a slide brings on the yawns….

It made it clear to me that knowing how to use social networking sites and how a younger generation uses them are two completely different things. It is their only true private space an extension of their bedrooms, without the parental authority that influences their use.

To see Danah's presentation follow thislink

Laurie O’Donnell (Director of Technology, LTS) had a much bigger agenda to get across, it was also good to hear a Scot for a change. His C.V. is impressive; LTS including Glow, LTS Online Service, Scottish Learning Festival and Corporate ICT support to LTS staff. He was also recently honoured as one of Edutopia’s ‘Global Six’ and personal honour by George Lucas. This was for his work with the Glow project.

His presentation turned out to be more of a discussion than a speech. This seemed to suit him much better. His wordy powerpoint (in contrast to Danah’s) laid out 2 basic philosophies towards learning, inspiringly named philosophy A and philosophy B. A was how it is now in education and B was Laurie’s vision. The area’s covered were immense. See below:

Philosophy A

Education                          Broken but can be fixed (Quickly)

Technology                       Drives change

Teachers                           Another problem that needs to be fixed

Learners                            The future workforce

Curriculum                        Don’t trust the teachers

Innovation                         Let a thousand projects flourish

Success                              Input targets and attainment

Philosophy B

Education                           Long term investment

Technology                        Enables, supports & accelerates change

Teachers                            Supported professionals

Learners                             More than just a future workforce

Curriculum                        Guidance & Support for Teachers

Innovation                         Scalable & Sustainable

Success                              Wider long term benefits

Laurie gave an interesting (and obvious) example of what success in education means: Finland: how safe do you feel on the streets, how healthy are your people, longevity, how many people do you send to jail? It goes way beyond improving test scores or training productive workers. You want citizens, community activists, good parents….

“Technology is a catalyst for change, it does NOT drive change. People make changes to make the world better.”

How do you pay for scalability and sustainability?

Question on assessment: QCA representative who answered -> we need to provide learners the environment to learn, we can’t just teach them to learn. Assessment bodies are fairly powerless when it comes to developing assessments as they mainly apply the policy that comes from higher up.

  • Implementation with a little help from
  • Politicians (committed to long-term development)
  • Civil servants (who see the big picture and can manage risk)
  • Secure funding (not based on small projects)
  • Great people who are doing the right things for the right reasons
  • Resilience
  • Hard work and a whole lotta luck
Big agenda, as you can see and the correct one as far as not only creating a workforce, but all round better people.
To see Laurie's presentation follow this link
During lunch I had a head full of things to consider, so I decided to empty some off it into my Blog. I would need the space later.
Re-imagining Teaching in the 21st Century was my choice of post lunch session. It was upstairs in the Porter Tun hall where we had been in the morning. The seating was re-arranged for purpose, more of a dining layout with large round tables. I grabbed a seat early (so I could plug my MacBook into a rare 13A socket and hence get power to my iPhone). The Twittering group had expanded from 2 or 3 to over a dozen and we maintained the tweet momentum. Some were live blogging, which looked interesting. It was great to feel part of the conference even though it wasn’t in a spoken format. I knew that, here, twittering was considered just as valid as any other type of social networking, data exchange and note taking, in fact it was the best solution for me. I was also able to inform those at the Academy who had subscribed, though this became less of a focus as the network developed.
I had met a bloke from Enfield outside who I had been twittering with (Andrew Rhodes - Ex Science teacher turned ICT Consultant Education). He recognised me from my twitter pic. He was interested in using mobile gaming platforms to deliver content and I was to bump into him several times throughout the duration of the conference.
I had particularly wanted to hear Marc Prensky speak on the subject of the future and hoped someone would directly challenge him on his Digital Natives ideology. The people on Twitter seemed undecided if we had (educators as a whole) completely debunked the idea or not. Sadly, Prensky was only a panellist and didn’t speak much.
A series of short presentations followed. I wont go into them in great detail but I have linked to the video’s below:
The session was hosted by Prof.Stephen Heppell
Dr David Cavello
Marc Prensky
Laurie O’Donnell
The Science Fiction fan in me particularly enjoyed Keri Facer’s presentation, though I found it difficult to comprehend these concepts as tangible issues or real challenges. It was interesting though. I made a mental note to investigate Futurelabs after the conference.
Ewan Macintosh drew my interest further, not least of all because he was Scottish (as was Laurie O’Donnell). I had started following Ewan’s tweets on Twitter beforehand and he had insinuated that he may be saying some challenging stuff…. It worked, he had my attention. As interesting as his presentation was, there was little challenging about it. He did say two things which needed saying; summative assessment should be eliminated and the digital natives theory (a throw away pop at Prensky) was a solution that held little cudos within the world of education anymore. I paraphrase.