The following are links to other pages in my WordPress account that specifically deal with the Micro Teaching Assignment in chronological order:
Micro Teaching Assignment – Links
March 7, 2009 at 12:09 pm (Flexible Delivery, PG-Cert, assessment, learning)
Tags: assessment, assignment, blocking, blog, blogging, brief, concept, delivery, dry run, education, evaluation, experiential, feedback, flexible, ipod, ipod touch, jamie mackay, kirkpatrick, kolb, learning, lecture, lecturer, mentoring, micro, mobile, Moodle, notation, pedagogy, podcast, podcastind, reflection, RSAMD, script, stage, stage management, student, teach, teaching, team, vodcast, Wordpress
Paperwork, Sound & Light
February 6, 2009 at 7:14 pm (2nd Year Experience, assessment, learning)
Tags: assessment, blog, blogging, delivery, education, employability, feedback, flexible, forum, forums, learning, Moodle, opera, pedagogy, peer, production, reflection, RSAMD, stage, stage management, student, teaching, team
As has been the case every morning this week, the students had score reading classes. Today was their last day and they all came back with the usual enthusiasm for the sessions. I must see if I can get the go-ahead to schedule more in. While they were attending the class I set up (on Moodle) a Critical Incident form and notified them that they should fill it in. The nice thing about doing one of these forms online is that Moodle collates al of the answers onto one sheet, making it easier to evaluate group responses. Hopefully I will get a better response than last years paper-based attempt.
I began the class (again in the Chandler) by introducing an old friend of mine from my theater days, Ruth Alexander. She is currently the Company Stage Manager at Pitlochry Festival Theater, the only repertoire venue in the UK. Pitlochry have always been good employers of RSAMD graduates and are a leading voice in FST. The combination of this and it being a repertoire system made getting Ruth involved with my students all the more interesting for them. The PLX students came along to sit in and contribute.
After the complaints of over work and long hours during the Opera from this same group of students, this actually turned our to be timely. Ruth’s talk made it clear that professional theater and the style in which Pitlochry works is not for the work shy or those adverse to working long hours. She brought around a raft of paperwork examples and had a series of supporting Powerpoint slides. This was much more than any other guest lecturer had ever turned up with to one of my classes. The students didn’t have to write anything down as notes were also provided. I was really pleased with the way the session went and on leaving I arranged a venue visit with Ruth for both myself and my students.
After lunch we sat around a table and discussed the paperwork they had produced so far. We discussed corporate layouts and I gave a series of tips and tricks to help them to produce professional looking documentation. We also touched on eDocuments and how we would be exploring this at a later date. This is an area that, if used appropriately could modernise Stage Management. I have never attempted to teach this area before and it is one I am looking forward to immensely.
Later on (after a few minor technical hic-cups) we were joined by the PLX students and ran a Sound Plot for both shows. We agreed on a cue order and added some new cues. We then briefed them on all the LX cues that were required, leaving them with a free reign to design any extra cues themselves.
In all it was a slow and relaxed day. I left the students to rig lighting and continue designing the sound, the SMs were briefed on getting thier Prompt Copies ready for Monday, when they were to cue thier shows, leaving an hour on Monday morning to go over thier weekend homework and make corrections. Another day full of simulations of actual production sessions, but slowed to a crawl. I wish I could use an actual production in this way as a learning environment, but the pressures placed on TPA by other departments agenda’s always makes this next to impossible. My aim is to use 2nd Year productions, such as the A2 Shakespeares as on such purely ‘learning production’ where the schedule is drawn out to accomodate both learning and reflection. A production where sessions can be paused for educational purposes and less emphasis is placed on simpley ‘gettin the show on’. That would leave 3rd Year as a purely production based forum for practise and the honing of skills.
He seem’d to find his way without his eyes;
February 4, 2009 at 10:08 pm (2nd Year Experience, learning)
Tags: acting, actor, appreciation, blog, blogging, delivery, education, Hamlet, learning, Ophelia, performance, performer, prompt, prompting, reflection, RSAMD, stage, stage management, student, teaching, training
The brief for today’s class (which was a half day) was handed out last week. It involved the students having to learn either Hamlets ‘To be, or not to be’ speech or Ophelia’s ‘on Hamlet’s perceived madness’ speech. I wanted to lay a solid grounding for their performance management skills, which were to come. It has always been my belief that to truly manage the rehearsal process effectively then a Stage or Deputy Stage Manager must also have an insight into the process that surround that of a performer. Too many rifts have been created through the misunderstanding between the two disciplines. Most of which have been caused by an ignorance of each others methods and remits.
This exercise can be unpopular, I have no doubt of that and for very good reason. Not many students (with the exception of the acting fraternity) would choose to give up their evenings to ensure that vast amounts of text are committed to memory. This unpopularity is actually the strength behind the task, after a few hours of reading and reading the same few passages, most get frustrated and commit the text to the bin. Through this process of failure, true appreciation can begin to evolve.
The 2nd Year Stage Managers gave it their best shot and I could see the frustration clearly when lines were dropped or forgotten. The task had been compounded by the addition of having to make a cup of tea in the process of recitation. Remembering lines was one thing, but having to do it while dealing with boiling water, pouring milk, adding sugar etc. was near impossible. A safety blanket was added in the form of a partner (DSM) who would prompt if required, though that in itself can be a trap. Once you ask for your first line it becomes a self-made comfort zone and the urge to ask for more and more as the pressure builds can become overwhelming. As for the prompter, human nature nearly always ‘kicks in’ and too many life-lines are thrown, hindering the learning process.
This simple act of learning lines and support is fascinating. The symbiosis between the actor and the Deputy Stage Manager really come to light during this process. After the students finished their recitals we discussed these points at length and I strongly feel that an empathy towards the performer was at least understood, if not heartfelt.
The remainder of the session was dedicated to preparing a working schedule for the production electricians and finding rehearsal provision for tomorrows blocking sessions, which would culminate in a run. I also received two separate emails from the American authors of the plays, allowing me to use them, royalty free and their best wishes attached. I past these messages on to the students to bolster their morale.
A short but extremely engaging day, which had more value attached to it than was first evident.
Ophelia
He took me by the wrist and held me hard;
Then goes he to the length of all his arm;
And, with his other hand thus o’er his brow,
He falls to such perusal of my face
As he would draw it. Long stay’d he so;
At last, a little shaking of mine arm
And thrice his head thus waving up and down,
He raised a sigh so piteous and profound
As it did seem to shatter all his bulk
And end his being: that done, he lets me go:
And, with his head over his shoulder turn’d,
He seem’d to find his way without his eyes;
Hamlet
To be, or not to be: that is the question:
Whether ’tis nobler in the mind to suffer
The slings and arrows of outrageous fortune,
Or to take arms against a sea of troubles,
And by opposing end them? To die: to sleep;
No more; and by a sleep to say we end
The heart-ache and the thousand natural shocks
That flesh is heir to, ’tis a consummation
Devoutly to be wish’d. To die, to sleep;
To sleep: perchance to dream: ay, there’s the rub;
For in that sleep of death what dreams may come
When we have shuffled off this mortal coil.
Mark Up
January 28, 2009 at 11:51 pm (1st Year Experience, learning)
Tags: blog, blogging, education, flexible, learning, mark up, pedagogy, reflection, RSAMD, stage, stage management, student, teaching
Spent the morning (when I wasn’t in meetings) drawing up a ground plan after failing to find any suitable designs to mark up in my afternoon class. There’s something pleasing about draughting, getting your angles right and using a pencil (a rare occurrence for me nowadays). I never could get my head into CAD software, so I jumped at the chance to draw by hand. It was a release to get away from pedagogy, learning styles and all of these new considerations for a while and do what I used to enjoy.
The students had a score reading class from 2pm to 3pm, which I saw the start of before atanding to a reem of photocopying before the class. Calum Wylie, a 3rd Year SM student came along to help out with the class. I had invited a couple of senior students the previous week as I felt peer learning (and teaching) would benefit both year groups. The mark up session was purely practical and one which I had done many times before, the addition of Calum gave it an extra element in which everyone (including myself) benefitted. I had gathered an assortment of mark up paraphenalia and put it all in a box, after a quick instructional summary of the process and a place for the students to start, I organised them into teams and handed them the box. They continued to start marking up, with both myself and Calum available to field questions, offer support and hand out handy advice when needed.
The atmosphere was strange this afternoon, can’t put my finger on it. It still felt relaxed and things trundled along nicely, but there was a definite edge in the air. Reflecting on it now, I think it may have been the first signs of stress, emitting from the students. Reading their blogs last night gave me the unanimous feeling that their workload was putting a strain on them. They have 3 big projects all running at the same time, a number of expected forums to post on and on top of all that a series of lines to memorise and a score to cue from tomorrow. We should address this, the problem lies with the lecturing staff being ignorant each others assignments and their content. Also, the students have created a lot of work for themselves, perhaps setting their standards too high. Why should they compromise though, surely it’s up to us (the staff) to timetable projects in such a way as to promote excellence and not compromise? I will have to reflect on this issue in my sleep as I can’t draw the solution out tonight.
The remainder of the class consisted of a refresher in blocking technique, in which Calum and I moved around the mark up, while the students notated the blocking. I ended by going over the schedule for tomorrow and a short congratulations to all those who blogged the night before.
Every student in the class has now been actively involved in their own reflective practice, all have used Twitter to some extent and 90% of them have blogged using WordPress. They were all briefed at the beginning of the week on how to effectively reflect and several ways in which Twitter can be used. I commented on every blog the night before and also asked the students to comment at least once on each others blogs. Most did and I now have a strong feeling that the beginnings of an online learning community is beginning to take shape. I also believe that this a first for RSAMD and it is my hope that this group will become the nucleus of a network of learners. I shall continue to encourage this cohort by commenting regularly on each blog, personalising thier learning through a scaffolding approach. If we are to learn our lessons from last years SM cohort, then it is to give this year group MORE TIME TO REFLECT.
Stage Management Summit
January 9, 2009 at 8:57 am (Student Support, employability, learning)
Tags: association, employability, forum, forums, future, learning, leitch, pedagogy, professional, skills, SMA, stage, stage management, student, summit, teaching, theater
As is usual with me, I seem to reflect somewhat annoyingly between the hours of 5am and 7am, forcing me to get up and blog. This morning was no exception, so in the midst of domestic breakfast and school chaos I am attempting to jot down my thoughts before they fade.
The idea of a summit for Stage Managers has been with me for a number of years, a day in which all 3 years of SM students and industry professionals all come together to discuss professional expectations of student graduates. It would also provide a valuable learning opportunity for the students, providing a forum to ask those questions only a professionally active SM can answer. I would also like this session to be hosted in a professional environment such as a working theater. I could even involve the Stage Management Association (SMA) and perhaps host skills workshops (that they already provide) in order for students to learn alongside professionals.
The idea was sparked again by the enhancement themes project we were given (see previous post), with particular inspiration derived from the Employability theme and the Leitch Report.
The problem has always been timing. Trying to get all 3 years of SM students free for a day together is difficult enough. This has further been compounded by the 1st Years not making the decision of what specialism they have chosen until the very end of Term 3, which I personally think is a term too late. I do feel that this problem isn’t insurmountable and the benefits far outweigh the potential workload of planning and preparation. It is also strongly linked to both institutional and governmental strategies with regards to skills learning, employability and is underpinned by a persuasive pedagogy.
To begin with I shall start to work on a simple model for the summit, trialing it with the current SM cohort as an internal event, at least to begin with.
Opera
December 23, 2008 at 11:06 am (learning)
Tags: centered, learning, opera, reading, score, stage, stage management, student, teaching
I have an issue developing in Stage Management, one which always has the potential of rearing up. One of our student electives for Stage Management is the option to either Stage Manage (SM) or Deputy Stage Manage (DSM) an Opera. There are no restrictions on this elective e.g. no prerequisites such as the ability to score read etc… However, score reading skills are all but essential to an Opera DSM and important to an SM. There are crude ‘work arounds’ which give the students some chance of getting through an Opera process but all of them fall short of ideal e.g. using a stop watch and concentrating extremely hard.
My question is, should we be offering this as an elective to non-score readers in the first place? or should it be left open and classes in score reading be offered up as a solution? The Opera process contains elements of professional practise that are of a high educational value, these elements aren’t currently available in any other form within the Academy at the time being. I would be reluctant to altogether remove the opportunity for non-score readers for this reason alone. Unfortunately, score reading classes aren’t free. I know you’re thinking One Academy and global budgets etc. which works as an ideal but has a different ’shop floor’ face, especially when it comes to money. I have managed to secure a total of 10 hours score reading tuition (for 1st and 2nd years) from the music school, but this is woefully inadequate and only touches on the provision required. Along with further sporadic tuition from a graduate music student.
All of this is operational mumbo-jumbo. The real matter that lies at the heart of the issue is the age old problem of using TPA students as production support and not identifying them as learners in thier own right. The Opera traditionally expects that all DSMs and SMs be score readers of a certain quality, we see the Opera’s as an arena to test our students etc… My opinion is somewhat different. I feel the Opera (and any RSAMD production) should be a place of learning. An elaborate classroom, where students can learn and try out newly found knowledge, either by trial and error or by tuition. This is where they learn the necessary skills, whether it be which knots to use in a particular scenario, or how to score read in context. By removing this opportunity from non-score reading Stage Managers we are partially removing the right to student centred learning. Knowing how to score read on an Opera could be considered an example of ‘best practice’ within the industry, but removing the option of student centred learning in this instance, from an educational institution could, in contrast, be considered as being ‘poor’ practice.
This would not be a problem if only the score readers within Stage Management opted to choose Opera’s as their elective choice, but they aren’t. Over the next two terms I have 2 students wishing to SM and DSM and Opera each, neither can score read. They have agreed to attend both 1st and 2nd year score reading classes, though I feel that these are only token gestures on the Academy’s behalf. The other option is to deal with this on a cases by case scenario and create provision as required, after all if a student doesn’t want to partake in an Opera then it is their choice not to, this would truly be exercising their right to student centered learning and the Opera will have to look elsewhere for their Stage Managers.



